Your comments

Nice of you to get the point. You saw what happened yesterday when Sava joined for a single game. It was you, me, and Jumper, who are arguably all better players from Sava and either Tony or moise who were on the other side. So the supposed match of the titans as Tony had called it lasted for a whopping one minute. At least when I'm on the other side I make you work for it.

And yeah, if that PhD is a thing it's not gonna get finished with procrastination.

You went out of your way and got screenshot happy so you could prove yourself like this is about you and your skill and not something that affects everyone who plays the mode. The 3:0 one would have sufficed, from that I can deduce that it was 2:0 at some point, you didn't have to spam the thread with it. Those three you were with might not have been a handicap for all I know. It's about average outcomes and experience, not about you. What aren't you getting about that? The hell are you on about?

 "I'm so good and can always win so there's no point in improving the balancing that affects everyone and not just me and balancing is gonna be off anyway so there's no difference in how bad it is".

If you're so damn good then what's your objection to improving the balancing? And why are you even informing me on your skills like it's something I wouldn't know about firsthand. When you start getting cocky then it turns into some petty contest. You and I both know where we stand when we go toe to toe (you're not that much of an unstoppable force and it's easy to claim you only lose due to afks when it's either that or being on a stacked team for you). With the amount of time you dedicate to it I'd expect you to be better. Go ahead and get to your 10k pointless points, make it 20k for all I care. The "rich stay rich" was about balancing that stacks the odds in favor of rank instead of using rank as a basis for balancing. You interpreted this being about you so are now needlessly subverting an apparent problem of bad balancing and once again it gets no attention and doesn't get addressed. So when I go for a few games during your eternal sessions I can expect most of the games to not to be fun cause they will be with one semi good guy and two stooges on my team. Just like poor Tony gets when he plays against me and then he rages in the message board. The 4 or 5 serviceable players could be spread out more evenly and it would more often result in less frustrating games for everyone. When the "balancing" was about as bad as it could get and all the highest ranked players were on one side and Taw was still around, him and I would group together just to have interesting games. But no one else is interested in that. I was the only one making posts about it until it got restored to this cause anything is better than that. Literally. In terms of balancing that was the worst possible setup and it went on for so long cause everyone was just grinding points against scrubs, occasionally ending up as the fifth man out. I guess that's what it takes for most guys to have fun, just "owning" without a challenge. Take a step back and see how the game could be better instead of being fine with the way it is cause you're not adversely affected. And then you talk the big talk about being a good dev. Go ahead and make a better football game, I might play it.

Perfect is the enemy of good. Balancing could be improved, big user base or not.

EDIT: And I don't get the "some extent" remark. The complaint is pretty straightforward. Balancing is bad. You're the one who benefits the most from it, being the top ranked player ensures you always get a better team, but fun games are more of a priority to grinding up useless points.

And to add to that, I don't know why football gets treated as an afterthought when it's the only persistently popular mode next to arena.

It's a pointless scoreboard that doesn't represent any football objective, it just takes up space. It used to be that bones in football added to your general bone count but there was a way to exploit it and farm bones by thousands so Rez disabled it. That scoreboard is just a carryover from free for all, or fort, or however you call it. It doesn't bother me, it's not distracting, but it does confuse kiddies on what  to do. 

What is wrong with me lending you my car for a spin but you use it to Uber people around without my knowledge? I don't mind it being optional or even mandatory as long as it's in the open. But if you're going to use someone else's resources to make money with unrelated work it's fair to notify them. This is unregulated because it's new territory, doesn't mean there aren't any ethical concerns. Also, I don't think this software can be trusted not to grasp for more processing power than it should.

Yeah, half the players are trying to glitch out. Place a pit or mountains all around the outer walls.

I mean "bump" as in +1. I support the idea.

Bump for the black cape, that one is easy to implement. Bump for the shield too, it doesn't have to be this design but a new shield is due. As for the weapons, best to keep them simple, any fancy design will just go unnoticed.

And from that day forth he was known as Ukryty the Chronicler.